The deskilling of web dev is harming the product but, more importantly, it's damaging our health
đź”— a linked post to
baldurbjarnason.com »
—
originally shared here on
Of course you’re having problems keeping up with everything that’s happening in web dev. Of course!
You’re expected to follow half-a-dozen different specialities, each relatively fast-paced and complex in its own right, and you’re supposed to do it without cutting into the hours where you do actual paid web development.
Worse yet, you’re not actually expected to use any of it directly. Instead you’re also supposed to follow the developments of framework abstractions that are layered on top of the foundation specialities, at least doubling the number of complex fields a web dev has to follow and understand, right out of the gate.
This is immense – an expectation so mind-boggling that we need to acknowledge just how remarkable it is that each of us has managed as well as we have.
This entire article is an excellent summary of the state of the software development industry from the perspective of a web developer. I think Baldur hit the nail on the head several times here.
I first learned Javascript from a book I got from the library somewhere around 1999. This predated XMLHttpRequest
, debuting with IE5 in 2001, which literally enables every single subsequent Javascript framework out there.
In just the last ten years alone, I’ve worked with React, Typescript, Coffeescript, Vue, Angular, Backbone.js, Ember.js, Next.js, ES6, and maybe another dozen Javascript variants that I can’t recall right now… but I wouldn’t consider myself an expert in any of them.
Like Baldur says in this article, “framework knowledge is perishable.” I don’t want to spend all my time learning a framework which, if history is any indicator, will be obsolete in a few years.
The underlying Javascript knowledge, though, is not ephemeral. I can dig up webpages I built in fifth grade and render them in moments with ease on my modern day Macbook, whereas dashboards built on React from only five years ago can only be brought up if I spend an entire day setting up an environment with a billion dependencies.
I can do that because the vanilla Javascript that worked in IE5 still works great in any modern browser.
I do have to be a realist, though… the jobs out there today do require you to use these frameworks because the software pipeline is way more complex than it was in 2000. Frameworks provide a standarized way of building software within this modern landscape. For the record, I have no problem picking one up in the course of my work and figuring it out.
I wish more organizations would simpilfy rather than move towards increasingly complex ways of writing and delivering software. I feel like so much more value could be realized by paring back the staggering amounts of dependencies that these frameworks use. Codebases would be much thinner, deploy times would be faster, your footprint for potential security threats would be smaller, etc. etc.
Anyway, I also think the way he wraps up this article is grimly astute:
The tech industry will never be a genuinely free market as long as big tech companies are allowed to be as big as they are today.
What we have today is a centrally-planned economy by MBA sociopaths, operated as a looting ground for the rich.
It will never function on normal competitive, supply-and-demand market principles.
Because, even though a healthier market is the only thing that has a hope of a return to the fast-growing tech industry of prior decades, it would also require big tech companies to accept a smaller slice of the overall pie and allow new competitors to grow.
Why do that when you can strangle the market and keep the entire corpse for yourself?
Literally laughed out loud at “centrally-planned economy by MBA sociopaths.”