I think that in any new medium in technology, there are the concepts around fair use and where the boundary is between what you have control over. When you put something out in the world, to what degree do you still get to control it and own it and license it? I think that all these things are basically going to need to get relitigated and rediscussed in the AI era.
When I downloaded Llama 3.2 yesterday, I had to agree to a rather lengthy licensing agreement which constrained how I could use it.
When you sign up for a Instagram or Facebook account, you have to agree to lengthy terms and conditions in which you give up your rights around the content you create.
If you want to push my buttons, all you need to do is something deeply hypocritical. Like, for example, the kind of insipid, hand-wavy remark that billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg make when they want "rules for thee, not for me" treatment.1
Thereās another pull quote here which deeply offends me:
āLook, weāre a big company,ā he said. āWe pay for content when itās valuable to people. Weāre just not going to pay for content when itās not valuable to people. I think that youāll probably see a similar dynamic with AI.ā
Seriously, the gall of this guy to say āyour content isnāt valuableā while raking in billions of dollars serving ads against it.
I keep getting the urge to join Facebook so I can sell some unneeded treasures on marketplace, but this article serves as a reminder that Meta is helmed by an individual who has a truly warped definition of the word āvalue.ā
Continue to the full article
→
In summary:
- Facebook is a [redacted] company with a terrible web interface.
- React is a technology created at Facebook to administer its interface.
- React enables you to build web applications and their interfaces the way Facebook does.
- I am not calling Facebook "Meta"
- JavaScript-first interfaces built on ecosystems like Reactās are cumbersome and under-performing.
- React prevails because its evangelical proponents and apologists have convinced developers that Facebookās success can be attributed to technological quality and not aggressive capitalism.
Over the past fifteen years, I feel like Iāve had a pretty good track record of knowing which technologies to pay attention to and which technologies to confidently let pass by me.
When React first dropped, I thought the setup process seemed so onerous and filled with so many dependencies that I slowly backed away and haven't really needed to look back.
It would be irresponsible of me to have zero experience in React, so of course I've inherited projects that others have started on top of it. But every time I jump into a React project, I feel like Iām Homer jumping into his unchlorinated pool.1
Continue to the full article
→
Here is how platforms die: First, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.
I call this enshittification, and it is a seemingly inevitable consequence arising from the combination of the ease of changing how a platform allocates value, combined with the nature of a "two-sided market," where a platform sits between buyers and sellers, hold each hostage to the other, raking off an ever-larger share of the value that passes between them.
If youāve spent much time in the same tech bubbles as me this past year, youāve probably come across this article already.
At a bare minimum, Iām sure youāve seen the phrase āenshittification.ā
Once you understand the concept, you do start to see the pattern unfold around you constantly. 1
While there are countless examples of this natural platform decay within our virtual world, what about the physical world?
Is enshittification simply human nature, an inescapable fate for any collaborative endeavor above a certain size?
And if enshittification is not inevitable, what are the forces that lead to it, and how can we combat them when building our own communities?
Continue to the full article
→
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, announced plans to build a new data center in Rosemount, Minnesota. The more than 700,000 square foot center will be located along County Road 42, just east of the Dakota County Technical College.
During an announcement Thursday, officials revealed the project had been under wraps for several years. They called the secret project "Project Bigfoot."
This will exist roughly a mile from my house.
Itās a lot of feelings, to be sure.
A quibble I have with this report is that Iām not entirely sure we can say with a straight face that Meta is a great representative of āemerging techā. What does that phrase even mean?
But maybe Iām just being a NIMBY. A hundred jobs at this data center isnāt bad, Minnesotaās cold season1 is perfect for naturally cooling these systems, and the folks I know who work at the city are extremely capable and thorough; they would not let something like this go through if they didnāt do their diligence regarding impacts to our various shared infrastructure.
So I guess, uh, welcome, Meta? I hope yāall do, as our Iowan neighbors reportedly claim, āstep up.ā
Continue to the full article
→
Politics isnāt a per se bad. Itās a process. Making politics more productive and substantial make society better. Having people ānopeā out of society whenever they get uncomfortable doesnāt help with any of the hard work politics does for things like allocating scarce resources, justice, or equity.
Poignant. I love this web comic.
Continue to the full article
→
With social media being a big part of my job (and a big part of maintaining clients as a freelancer), I know I can't totally get rid of Facebook and Twitter, and I certainly can't shed myself off of YouTube. But since the latest "Google Privacy Scandal of the Week," I've really been trying to ween myself off of as many free services as I can. It's really pretty stupid: why are we willing to give so much information to these companies who are more than willing to sell it to the highest bidder?
This is a great article in the New York Times about the various organizations who mine and utilize the information we give to companies like Facebook every day. This part, in particular, really worried me:
Stereotyping is alive and well in data aggregation. Your application for credit could be declined not on the basis of your own finances or credit history, but on the basis of aggregate data ā what other people whose likes and dislikes are similar to yours have done. If guitar players or divorcing couples are more likely to renege on their credit-card bills, then the fact that youāve looked at guitar ads or sent an e-mail to a divorce lawyer might cause a data aggregator to classify you as less credit-worthy.
Even more scary:
The term Weblining describes the practice of denying people opportunities based on their digital selves. You might be refused health insurance based on a Google search you did about a medical condition. You might be shown a credit card with a lower credit limit, not because of your credit history, but because of your race, sex or ZIP code or the types of Web sites you visit.
Just searching for something like "diabetes symptoms" could disqualify you for health insurance, even if you were just doing research for an article on the disease.
I bet the first person who makes a social network that values its users' privacy and operates on a model that can make money without selling out their users will become very, very wealthy.
Continue to the full article
→
Susan Etlinger, an analyst at the Altimeter Group, said society was adopting new behaviors and expectations in response to the near-ubiquity of Facebook and other social networks.
āPeople may start to ask the question that, if you arenāt on social channels, why not? Are you hiding something?ā she said. āThe norms are shifting.ā
I don't know if people ever think that because you're not on Facebook, you are hiding something. It can be frustrating to organize an event and try to remember all of your friends who aren't on Facebook, but besides that, I think a lot of my friends have a bit of respect for those who can get away.
As soon as something better comes along, or as soon as Facebook screws up big (like GoDaddy big), people will move to greener pastures.
Continue to the full article
→