Why We Can't Have Nice Software
š a linked post to
andrewkelley.me »
—
originally shared here on
The problem with software is that it's too powerful. It creates so much wealth so fast that it's virtually impossible to not distribute it.
Think about it: sure, it takes a while to make useful software. But then you make it, and then it's done. It keeps working with no maintenance whatsoever, and just a trickle of electricity to run it.
Immediately, this poses a problem: how can a small number of people keep all that wealth for themselves, and not let it escape in the dirty, dirty fingers of the general populace?
Such a great article explaining why we canāt have nice things when it comes to software.
There is a good comparison in here between blockchain and LLMs, specifically saying both technologies are the sort of software that never gets completed or perfected.
I think itās hard to ascribe a quality like ācompletedā to virtually anything humans build. Homes are always a work in progress. So are highbrow social constructs like self-improvement and interpersonal relationships.
I think itās less interesting to me to try and determine what makes a technology good or bad. The key question is: does it solve someoneās problem?
You could argue that the blockchain solves problems for guaranteeing the authenticity of an item for a large multinational or something, sure. But Iām yet to be convinced of its ability to instill a better layer of trust in our economy.
LLMs, on the other hand, are showing tremendous value and solving many problems for me, personally.
What we should be focusing on is how to sustainably utilize our technology such that it benefits the most people possible.
And we all have a role to play with that notion in the work we do.